netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jkbs@redhat.com>
To: Jonathan Basseri <misterikkit@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	steffen.klassert@secunet.com, lorenzo@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xfrm: Clear sk_dst_cache when applying per-socket policy.
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:03:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170816110341.5e899c23@beetle> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170815222510.21711-1-misterikkit@google.com>

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:25:10 -0700
Jonathan Basseri <misterikkit@google.com> wrote:

> If an IPv6 socket has a valid dst cache, then xfrm_lookup_route will get
> skipped. However, the cache is not invalidated when applying policy to a
> socket (i.e. IPV6_XFRM_POLICY). The result is that new policies are
> sometimes ignored on those sockets.
> 
> This can be demonstrated like so,
> 1. Create UDPv6 socket.
> 2. connect() the socket.
> 3. Apply an outbound XFRM policy to the socket.
> 4. send() data on the socket.
> 
> Packets will continue to be sent in the clear instead of matching an
> xfrm or returning a no-match error (EAGAIN). This affects calls to
> send() and not sendto().
> 
> Note: Creating normal XFRM policies should have a similar effect on
> sk_dst_cache entries that match the policy, but that is not fixed in
> this patch.
> 
> Fixes: 00bc0ef5880d ("ipv6: Skip XFRM lookup if dst_entry in socket cache is valid")
> Tested: https://android-review.googlesource.com/418659
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Basseri <misterikkit@google.com>
> ---

Thank you for the fix.

Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jkbs@redhat.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-16  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-15 22:25 [PATCH net] xfrm: Clear sk_dst_cache when applying per-socket policy Jonathan Basseri
2017-08-16  9:03 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2017-08-16  9:03 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2017-08-16 10:43   ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-16 11:19     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2017-10-24  1:18 ` Jonathan Basseri
2017-10-24  7:04   ` Steffen Klassert
2017-10-24 16:58     ` Jonathan Basseri 😶
2017-10-25  4:25       ` Steffen Klassert
2017-10-25 16:52         ` Jonathan Basseri
2017-10-25 16:52 ` [PATCH net v2] " Jonathan Basseri
2017-10-26 10:54   ` Steffen Klassert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-24  1:30 [PATCH net] " Jonathan Basseri 😶

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170816110341.5e899c23@beetle \
    --to=jkbs@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=lorenzo@google.com \
    --cc=misterikkit@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).