From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: leedom@chelsio.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
helgaas@kernel.org, werner@chelsio.com, ganeshgr@chelsio.com,
asit.k.mallick@intel.com, patrick.j.cramer@intel.com,
Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, Bob.Shaw@amd.com,
l.stach@pengutronix.de, amira@mellanox.com,
gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com, David.Laight@aculab.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] PCI: fix the return value for the pci_find_pcie_root_port()
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 12:51:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170817105156.GA18789@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502936730-7368-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1589 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:25:30AM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> The pci_find_pcie_root_port() would return NULL if the given
> dev is already a Root Port, it looks like unfriendly to the
> PCIe Root Port device, Thierry and Bjorn suggest to let this
> function return the given dev under this circumstances.
>
> Fixes: 0e405232871d6 ("PCI: fix oops when try to find Root Port for a PCI device")
> Suggested-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 7e2022f..352bb53 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ struct resource *pci_find_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, struct resource *res)
> */
> struct pci_dev *pci_find_pcie_root_port(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *bridge, *highest_pcie_bridge = NULL;
> + struct pci_dev *bridge, *highest_pcie_bridge = dev;
>
> bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> while (bridge && pci_is_pcie(bridge)) {
I think this should actually be this change on top of a revert of commit
0e405232871d6 ("PCI: fix oops when try to find Root Port for a PCI
device"). After the above change, the previous fix will have a redundant
check because highest_pcie_bridge will never be NULL.
Let me send out that version to clarify what I mean.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-17 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-17 2:25 [PATCH net] PCI: fix the return value for the pci_find_pcie_root_port() Ding Tianhong
2017-08-17 2:42 ` David Miller
2017-08-17 10:51 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2017-08-17 12:40 ` Ding Tianhong
2017-08-17 13:30 ` Thierry Reding
2017-08-17 13:38 ` Ding Tianhong
2017-08-17 11:06 ` [PATCH] PCI: Allow PCI express root ports to find themselves Thierry Reding
2017-08-17 16:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-18 1:29 ` Shawn Lin
2017-08-18 4:32 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-18 23:14 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170817105156.GA18789@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=Bob.Shaw@amd.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=amira@mellanox.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
--cc=ganeshgr@chelsio.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=leedom@chelsio.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrick.j.cramer@intel.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=werner@chelsio.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).