From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] about net: Fix inconsistent teardown and release of private netdev state.
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:58:35 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170818.155835.2053259542629638150.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503062029.4936.173.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 06:13:49 -0700
> On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 22:21 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:30:40 -0700
>>
>> > So we do not really know if we need to clean up or not.
>>
>> We always know, the answer is that whenever register_netdev() fails we
>> never need to perform any cleanup which is done by priv_destructor.
>>
>> > Any idea how to fix the issue ?
>>
>> Your patch is exactly how we should fix this, but without the comment.
>> The logic is straightforward.
>>
>> If register_netdevice() fails any resources handled by priv_destructor
>> are cleaned up, it is guaranteed.
>
> Not in current code.
>
> There are some failures which do a "goto out;"
>
> out:
> return ret;
>
>
> In these cases, priv_destructor is not called.
>
> So we need multiple fixes I think :/
I don't think so.
The cases that "goto out;" in register_netdevce() are those that
execute before ->ndo_init() succeeds.
Only if ->ndo_succeeds() runs successfully should ->priv_destructor()
need execute.
So everything is fine as far as I can see.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-17 22:30 [RFC] about net: Fix inconsistent teardown and release of private netdev state Eric Dumazet
2017-08-18 5:21 ` David Miller
2017-08-18 13:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-18 22:58 ` David Miller [this message]
2017-08-19 3:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-21 21:13 ` David Miller
2017-08-25 14:57 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170818.155835.2053259542629638150.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).