From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Yang, Yi" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] openvswitch: enable NSH support Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:41:02 +0800 Message-ID: <20170821084101.GB74649@cran64.bj.intel.com> References: <1503294863-12859-1-git-send-email-yi.y.yang@intel.com> <20170821102509.076d7cc9@griffin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, blp@ovn.org, e@erig.me, jan.scheurich@ericsson.com To: Jiri Benc Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:29586 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751895AbdHUIzi (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2017 04:55:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170821102509.076d7cc9@griffin> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:25:09AM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:54:23 +0800, Yi Yang wrote: > > v4->v5 > > - Fix many comments by Jiri Benc and Eric Garver > > for v4. > > NACK for v5, we haven't finished discussing v4. You're sending new > versions too quickly. > > My comment about sending a new version was meant only for the rest of > the patch that I have not reviewed - i.e. that once the comments I've > made so far are addressed, I'm fine with continuing reviewing in a new > version. > > It did not mean that I'm okay with sending a new version without my > comments to the first part being addressed. Which they are not, see my > reply to your mail at v4. > > Sorry if that was not clear but I won't review v5 until we have > conclusion for the v4 comments. Ok, let me fix comments for v4 first. > > Jiri