From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
"xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org" <xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
"Andy Gospodarek" <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paweł Staszewski" <pstaszewski@itcare.pl>,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: XDP redirect measurements, gotchas and tracepoints
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:56:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170823105638.332a8348@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <599C6747.8010005@gmail.com>
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:17:59 -0700
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/22/2017 10:09 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:37:10AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Once tx-ing netdev added to devmap we can enable xdp on it automatically?
> >>
> >> I think you are referring to Gotcha-2 here:
> >
> > oops. yes :)
> >
> >>
> >> Second gotcha(2): you cannot TX out a device, unless it also have a
> >> xdp bpf program attached. (This is an implicit dependency, as the
> >> driver code need to setup XDP resources before it can ndo_xdp_xmit).
> >>
> >> Yes, we should work on improving this situation. Auto enabling XDP
> >> when a netdev is added to a devmap is a good solution. Currently this
> >> is tied to loading an XDP bpf_prog. Do you propose loading a dummy
> >> bpf_prog on the netdev? (then we need to handle 1. not replacing
> >> existing bpf_prog, 2. on take-down don't remove "later" loaded
> >> bpf_prog).
> >
> > right. these things need to be taken care of.
> > Technically for ndo_xdp_xmit to work the program doesn't need
> > to be attached, but the device needs to be in xdp mode with
> > configured xdp tx rings.
> > The easiest, of course, is just to document it :)
> > and may be add some sort of warning that if netdev is added
> > to devmap and it's not in xdp mode, return warning or error.
> >
>
> When I wrote this I assumed some user space piece could
> load the "dummy" nop program on devices as needed. It seemed
> easier than putting semi-complex logic in the kernel to load
> programs on update_elem, but only if the user hasn't already
> loaded a program and then unload it but again only if some
> criteria is met. Then we would have one more kernel path into
> load/unload BPF programs and would need all the tests and what
> not.
I agree, it is not good to add this kind of logic to the kernel. We
would create too many funny race conditions with userspace.
> +1 for documenting and userland usability patches.
We still don't have a good place for XDP documentation. My own[1]
attempt have gotten out-of-sync, and I need to restructure the
rst-docs, before I want to propose it for the kernel.
[1] https://prototype-kernel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/networking/XDP/index.html
I want to create some samples/examples with XDP_REDIRECT, that
highlight this property. Maybe the samples/bpf/xdp_redirect{,_map}
should automatically attach a XDP bpf_prog to the egress device?
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-21 19:25 XDP redirect measurements, gotchas and tracepoints Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-21 22:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-08-22 6:37 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-22 17:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-08-22 17:17 ` John Fastabend
2017-08-23 8:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-08-22 18:02 ` Michael Chan
2017-08-22 18:17 ` John Fastabend
2017-08-22 18:30 ` Duyck, Alexander H
2017-08-22 20:04 ` Michael Chan
2017-08-23 1:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-08-23 6:59 ` Michael Chan
2017-08-23 8:29 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-25 3:36 ` Michael Chan
2017-08-25 12:45 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-25 15:10 ` John Fastabend
2017-08-25 15:28 ` Michael Chan
2017-08-28 16:02 ` Andy Gospodarek
2017-08-28 16:11 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-08-29 13:26 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-29 16:23 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-08-29 19:02 ` Andy Gospodarek
2017-08-29 19:52 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-08-28 16:14 ` John Fastabend
2017-08-28 19:39 ` Andy Gospodarek
2017-08-23 14:51 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170823105638.332a8348@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pstaszewski@itcare.pl \
--cc=xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).