From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] e1000e: Be drop monitor friendly
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20170824.212959.70798260439682691.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20170825035824.26935-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@gmail.com,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: f.fainelli@gmail.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170825035824.26935-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:58:24 -0700

> e1000_put_txbuf() cleans up the successfully transmitted TX packets,
> e1000e_tx_hwtstamp_work() also does the successfully completes the
> timestamped TX packets, e1000_clean_rx_ring() cleans up the RX ring and
> e1000_remove() cleans up the timestampted packets. None of these
> functions should be reporting dropped packets, so make them use
> dev_consume_skb_any() to be drop monitor friendly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

I'll let the Intel folks pick this up.