netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, fw@strlen.de
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 3/4] net_sched: remove tc class reference counting
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:00:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170825090021.GA4829@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824235130.28503-4-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>

Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 01:51:29AM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:
>For TC classes, their ->get() and ->put() are always paired, and the
>reference counting is completely useless, because:
>
>1) For class modification and dumping paths, we already hold RTNL lock,
>   so all of these ->get(),->change(),->put() are atomic.

There is ongoing initiative by Florian to avoid taking RTNL for some
rtnetlink calls. I think that for dumping it could be done in tc as well.
Don't we need the refcnt then?


>
>2) For filter bindiing/unbinding, we use other reference counter than
>   this one, and they should have RTNL lock too.
>
>3) For ->qlen_notify(), it is special because it is called on ->enqueue()
>   path, but we already hold qdisc tree lock there, and we hold this
>   tree lock when graft or delete the class too, so it should not be gone
>   or changed until we release the tree lock.
>
>Therefore, this patch removes ->get() and ->put(), but:
>
>1) Adds a new ->find() to find the pointer to a class by classid, no
>   refcnt.
>
>2) Move the original class destroy upon the last refcnt into ->delete(),
>   right after releasing tree lock. This is fine because the class is
>   already removed from hash when holding the lock.
>
>For those who also use ->put() as ->unbind(), just rename them to reflect
>this change.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-25  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-24 23:51 [Patch net-next v2 0/4] net_sched: clean up tc classes and u32 filter Cong Wang
2017-08-24 23:51 ` [Patch net-next v2 1/4] net_sched: get rid of more forward declarations Cong Wang
2017-08-25  8:45   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-25 11:51   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-24 23:51 ` [Patch net-next v2 2/4] net_sched: introduce tclass_del_notify() Cong Wang
2017-08-25  8:54   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-25 11:51   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-24 23:51 ` [Patch net-next v2 3/4] net_sched: remove tc class reference counting Cong Wang
2017-08-25  9:00   ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2017-08-25  9:18     ` Florian Westphal
2017-08-25  9:36       ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-25  9:41   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-25 12:28   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-24 23:51 ` [Patch net-next v2 4/4] net_sched: kill u32_node pointer in Qdisc Cong Wang
2017-08-25  9:06   ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-25 12:29   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-25 12:37     ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-26  0:20 ` [Patch net-next v2 0/4] net_sched: clean up tc classes and u32 filter David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170825090021.GA4829@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).