[net-next PATCH 5/9] bpf: more SK_SKB selftests

John Fastabend
2017-08-28T14:11:37Z

Tests packet read/writes and additional skb fields.

Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 353d170..8eb0995 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -1119,6 +1119,104 @@ struct test_val {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
},
{
+ "invalid access of tc_classid for SK_SKB",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ },
+ {
+ "check skb->mark is writeable by SK_SKB",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+ },
+ {
+ "check skb->tc_index is writeable by SK_SKB",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+ },
+ {
+ "check skb->priority is writeable by SK_SKB",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, priority)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+ },
+ {
+ "direct packet read for SK_SKB",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+ },
+ {
+ "direct packet write for SK_SKB",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+ },
+ {
+ "overlapping checks for direct packet access SK_SKB",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 4),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 6),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 6),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+ },
+ {
"check skb->mark is not writeable by sockets",
.insns = {
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,