From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Fastabend Subject: [net-next PATCH 5/9] bpf: more SK_SKB selftests Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 07:11:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20170828141124.14143.92130.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> References: <20170828140850.14143.83953.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:34142 "EHLO mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751232AbdH1OLh (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:11:37 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f196.google.com with SMTP id p69so400817pfk.1 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 07:11:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170828140850.14143.83953.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Tests packet read/writes and additional skb fields. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 353d170..8eb0995 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -1119,6 +1119,104 @@ struct test_val { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, }, { + "invalid access of tc_classid for SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + }, + { + "check skb->mark is writeable by SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "check skb->tc_index is writeable by SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "check skb->priority is writeable by SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, priority)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "direct packet read for SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "direct packet write for SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "overlapping checks for direct packet access SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 4), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 6), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { "check skb->mark is not writeable by sockets", .insns = { BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,