From: "Stefan Sørensen" <stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com>
To: richardcochran@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: "Stefan Sørensen" <stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] dp83640: don't hold spinlock while calling netif_rx_ni
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 08:58:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170830065847.2444-1-stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com> (raw)
We should not hold a spinlock while pushing the skb into the networking
stack, so move the call to netif_rx_ni out of the critical region to where
we have dropped the spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Sørensen <stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com>
---
drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
index c3065236ffcc..cbd629822f04 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
@@ -874,7 +874,6 @@ static void decode_rxts(struct dp83640_private *dp83640,
shhwtstamps = skb_hwtstamps(skb);
memset(shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(*shhwtstamps));
shhwtstamps->hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(rxts->ns);
- netif_rx_ni(skb);
list_add(&rxts->list, &dp83640->rxpool);
break;
}
@@ -885,6 +884,9 @@ static void decode_rxts(struct dp83640_private *dp83640,
list_add_tail(&rxts->list, &dp83640->rxts);
out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp83640->rx_lock, flags);
+
+ if (shhwtstamps)
+ netif_rx_ni(skb);
}
static void decode_txts(struct dp83640_private *dp83640,
@@ -1425,7 +1427,6 @@ static bool dp83640_rxtstamp(struct phy_device *phydev,
shhwtstamps = skb_hwtstamps(skb);
memset(shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(*shhwtstamps));
shhwtstamps->hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(rxts->ns);
- netif_rx_ni(skb);
list_del_init(&rxts->list);
list_add(&rxts->list, &dp83640->rxpool);
break;
@@ -1438,6 +1439,8 @@ static bool dp83640_rxtstamp(struct phy_device *phydev,
skb_info->tmo = jiffies + SKB_TIMESTAMP_TIMEOUT;
skb_queue_tail(&dp83640->rx_queue, skb);
schedule_delayed_work(&dp83640->ts_work, SKB_TIMESTAMP_TIMEOUT);
+ } else {
+ netif_rx_ni(skb);
}
return true;
--
2.13.5
next reply other threads:[~2017-08-30 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 6:58 Stefan Sørensen [this message]
2017-08-30 21:50 ` [PATCH net-next] dp83640: don't hold spinlock while calling netif_rx_ni David Miller
2017-08-31 7:25 ` Richard Cochran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170830065847.2444-1-stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com \
--to=stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox