netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH] lib/bpf: Fix bytecode-file parsing
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:11:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170830141155.GH20614@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59A6C377.90705@iogearbox.net>

Hi Daniel,

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:53:59PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 08/29/2017 05:09 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -228,18 +229,20 @@ static int bpf_parse_string(char *arg, bool from_file, __u16 *bpf_len,
> >   			case '\n':
> >   				if (c_prev != ',')
> >   					*(pos++) = ',';
> > +				c_prev = ',';
> >   				break;
> >   			case ' ':
> >   			case '\t':
> >   				if (c_prev != ' ')
> >   					*(pos++) = c;
> > +				c_prev = ' ';
> >   				break;
> >   			default:
> >   				*(pos++) = c;
> > +				c_prev = c;
> >   			}
> >   			if (pos - tmp_string == tmp_len)
> >   				break;
> > -			c_prev = c;
> 
> I don't really have a strong opinion on this, but the logic for
> normalizing here is getting a bit convoluted. Is your use case
> for making the parser more robust mainly so you can just use the
> -ddd output from tcpdump for cBPF w/o piping through tr? But even
> that shouldn't give multiple empty lines afaik, no?

Well, using tcpdump output was functional before already. I just noticed
that if I add an empty line to the end of bytecode-file, it will fail
and I didn't like that. Then while searching for the EOF issue, I
noticed that the parser logic above is a bit faulty in that it will
treat different characters equally but doesn't make sure c_prev will be
assigned only one of them. So apart from the added robustness, it really
fixes an inconsistency in the parsing logic.

Cheers, Phil

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-30 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-29 15:09 [iproute PATCH] lib/bpf: Fix bytecode-file parsing Phil Sutter
2017-08-30 13:53 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-08-30 14:11   ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2017-09-01 19:13     ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-09-04 19:09 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170830141155.GH20614@orbyte.nwl.cc \
    --to=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).