From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-binding: net: sfp binding documentation Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:58:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20170830145829.GA22289@lunn.ch> References: <7ae5d883fd038cf518949b0aa9cbe5369e2a1851.1504086672.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> <89261369-d97c-a78c-5a21-a269b2c7e513@cogentembedded.com> <20170830111118.wy62va6sjzsxrgoo@tarshish> <20170830112557.dhcl3pv7gmuzg22v@tarshish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Florian Fainelli , "David S. Miller" , Russell King , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org To: Baruch Siach Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:45152 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751317AbdH3O6k (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:58:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170830112557.dhcl3pv7gmuzg22v@tarshish> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > > > Your example shows there's GPIO phandle *and* specifier. > > > > > > Would "GPIO specifier" be enough here? > > > > No, specifier is the cells following GPIO (or any other) phandle. > > So this should be "GPIO phandle and specifier of ...", is that correct? > > I have found very few (< 4) occurrences of this language in (lots of) '-gpios' > property descriptions under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/. Is this a new > requirement? Sometimes it is just easier to refer to another document: GPIO, as defined in Documentation/devicetree/binding/gpio/gpio.txt Andrew