From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cc: brouer@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
andrew@lunn.ch, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: add tracepoint in br_fdb_update
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:38:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170831143814.68709334@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504156693-24692-1-git-send-email-roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 22:18:13 -0700
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
>
> This extends bridge fdb table tracepoints to also cover
> learned fdb entries in the br_fdb_update path. Note that
> unlike other tracepoints I have moved this to when the fdb
> is modified because this is in the datapath and can generate
> a lot of noise in the trace output. br_fdb_update is also called
> from added_by_user context in the NTF_USE case which is already
> traced ..hence the !added_by_user check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/bridge.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 5 ++++-
> net/core/net-traces.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/bridge.h b/include/trace/events/bridge.h
> index 0f1cde0..1bee3e7 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/bridge.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/bridge.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,37 @@ TRACE_EVENT(fdb_delete,
> __entry->addr[4], __entry->addr[5], __entry->vid)
> );
>
> +TRACE_EVENT(br_fdb_update,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *source,
> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, bool added_by_user),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(br, source, addr, vid, added_by_user),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __string(br_dev, br->dev->name)
> + __string(dev, source->dev->name)
I have found that using the device string name is
(1) slow as it involves strcpy+strlen
See [1]+[2] where a single dev-name costed me 16 ns, and the base
overhead of a bpf attached tracepoint is 25 ns (see [3]).
[1] https://git.kernel.org/davem/net-next/c/e7d12ce121a
[2] https://git.kernel.org/davem/net-next/c/315ec3990ef
[3] https://git.kernel.org/davem/net-next/c/25d4dae1a64
(2) strings are also harder to work-with/extract when attaching a bpf_prog
See the trouble I'm in accessing a dev string here napi:napi_poll here:
https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/blob/103b955a080/kernel/samples/bpf/napi_monitor_kern.c#L52-L58
Using ifindex'es in userspace is fairly easy see man if_indextoname(3).
> + __array(unsigned char, addr, ETH_ALEN)
> + __field(u16, vid)
> + __field(bool, added_by_user)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __assign_str(br_dev, br->dev->name);
> + __assign_str(dev, source->dev->name);
> + memcpy(__entry->addr, addr, ETH_ALEN);
> + __entry->vid = vid;
> + __entry->added_by_user = added_by_user;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("br_dev %s source %s addr %02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x vid %u added_by_user %d",
> + __get_str(br_dev), __get_str(dev), __entry->addr[0],
> + __entry->addr[1], __entry->addr[2], __entry->addr[3],
> + __entry->addr[4], __entry->addr[5], __entry->vid,
> + __entry->added_by_user)
> +);
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-31 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-31 5:18 [PATCH net-next] bridge: add tracepoint in br_fdb_update Roopa Prabhu
2017-08-31 12:38 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-08-31 15:21 ` Roopa Prabhu
2017-08-31 15:30 ` David Ahern
2017-08-31 16:20 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-31 18:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-08-31 14:19 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-08-31 18:43 ` David Miller
2017-08-31 21:50 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-31 22:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170831143814.68709334@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).