From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Ivan Delalande <colona@arista.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] tcp_diag: report TCP MD5 signing keys and addresses
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 17:47:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170901154744.GA5673@bistromath.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170901002118.sprwhuybmk4spy34@ycc.fr>
2017-09-01, 02:21:18 +0200, Ivan Delalande wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:26:33AM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > 2017-08-31, 09:59:39 -0700, Ivan Delalande wrote:
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_diag.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_diag.c
> > > index a748c74aa8b7..abbf0edcf6c2 100644
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_diag.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_diag.c
> > [...]
> > > +static int tcp_diag_get_aux(struct sock *sk, bool net_admin,
> > > + struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > +{
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
> > > + if (net_admin) {
> >
> > In tcp_diag_get_aux_size() you put a check for sk_fullsock. I don't
> > see anything preventing you from reaching this with a !fullsock?
>
> Currently handler->idiag_get_aux is only called from inet_sk_diag_fill
> which has a `BUG_ON(!sk_fullsock(sk));`, but I could add another
Oh, right, that's the part I was missing. Thanks.
> explicit check in that function if you think it's more consistent.
>
> Actually, I wasn't sure when adding this idiag_get_aux in v2 if it
> should be called from inet_twsk_diag_fill, inet_req_diag_fill and
> inet_csk_diag_fill, or just the last one. I chose that simpler approach
> for now to avoid duplicating these state checks in the idiag_get_aux
> defined by protocols and because we didn't need for INET_DIAG_MD5SIG,
> but it shouldn't be too hard to change. Do you think this could be
> useful for other protocols or attributes?
No opinion. It can be added later if necessary.
--
Sabrina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-01 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-31 16:59 [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] report TCP MD5 signing keys and addresses Ivan Delalande
2017-08-31 16:59 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] inet_diag: allow protocols to provide additional data Ivan Delalande
2017-09-01 2:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-31 16:59 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] tcp_diag: report TCP MD5 signing keys and addresses Ivan Delalande
2017-08-31 23:26 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2017-09-01 0:21 ` Ivan Delalande
2017-09-01 15:47 ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2017-09-01 2:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-02 1:38 ` [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170901154744.GA5673@bistromath.localdomain \
--to=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=colona@arista.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox