netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, andy@greyhouse.net
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, ast@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bpf: don't select potentially stale ri->map from buggy xdp progs
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 13:52:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170908135242.55f99177@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59B27234.4050703@iogearbox.net>

On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 12:34:28 +0200 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:

> On 09/08/2017 07:06 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > On Fri,  8 Sep 2017 00:14:51 +0200
> > Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> >  
> >> +	/* This is really only caused by a deliberately crappy
> >> +	 * BPF program, normally we would never hit that case,
> >> +	 * so no need to inform someone via tracepoints either,
> >> +	 * just bail out.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	if (unlikely(map_owner != xdp_prog))
> >> +		return -EINVAL;  
> >
> > IMHO we do need to call the tracepoint here.  It is not just crappy
> > BPF-progs that cause this situation, it is also drivers not implementing
> > XDP_REDIRECT yet (which is all but ixgbe).  Due to the level XDP
> > operates at, tracepoints are the only way users can runtime troubleshoot
> > their XDP programs.  
> 
> Drivers not implementing XDP_REDIRECT don't even get there in
> the first place. What they will do is to hit the 'default' case
> when they check for the action code from the BPF program. Then
> call into bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act), and fall-through
> to hit the tracepoint at trace_xdp_exception() which is also
> triggered by XDP_ABORTED usually. So when that happens we do
> complain loudly and call a tracepoint already. We should probably
> tweak the bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action() message a little to make
> it clear that the action could also just be unsupported by the
> driver instead of being illegal.

Yes. drivers not implementing XDP_REDIRECT will cause a tracepoint
trace_xdp_exception() to be called for its _own_ packets.

But it will still setup and leave map and map_owner pointer dangling.
Another NIC can load an xdp_prog that return XDP_REDIRECT, which will hit
above if-statement, and its packets will disappear, without getting
recorded by a tracepoint (thus hard to debug!).

The fundamental point is that tracepoints is the way we choose to
handle debugging XDP programs.  Thus, we must trigger a tracepoint when
a packet gets dropped.  Even in this unlikely case.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-08 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-07 22:14 [PATCH net] bpf: don't select potentially stale ri->map from buggy xdp progs Daniel Borkmann
2017-09-07 22:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-09-08  5:06 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-09-08 10:34   ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-09-08 11:52     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-09-08 12:34       ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-09-08 13:07         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170908135242.55f99177@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).