From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@mellanox.com,
jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net v3 1/3] net_sched: get rid of tcfa_rcu
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 12:40:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170912104004.GE2036@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170912094215.GB2036@nanopsycho>
Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:42:15AM CEST, jiri@resnulli.us wrote:
>Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 01:33:30AM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:
>>gen estimator has been rewritten in commit 1c0d32fde5bd
>>("net_sched: gen_estimator: complete rewrite of rate estimators"),
>>the caller is no longer needed to wait for a grace period.
>>So this patch gets rid of it.
>>
>>This also completely closes a race condition between action free
>>path and filter chain add/remove path for the following patch.
>>Because otherwise the nested RCU callback can't be caught by
>>rcu_barrier().
>>
>>Please see also the comments in code.
>
>Looks like this is causing a null pointer dereference bug for me, 100%
>of the time. Just add and remove any rule with action and you get:
>
[...]
>
>Looks like you need to save owner of the module before you call
>__tcf_idr_release so you can later on use it for module_put
This patch helps:
diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
index fcd7dc7..de73e71 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
@@ -514,13 +514,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_action_exec);
int tcf_action_destroy(struct list_head *actions, int bind)
{
+ const struct tc_action_ops *ops;
struct tc_action *a, *tmp;
int ret = 0;
list_for_each_entry_safe(a, tmp, actions, list) {
+ ops = a->ops;
ret = __tcf_idr_release(a, bind, true);
if (ret == ACT_P_DELETED)
- module_put(a->ops->owner);
+ module_put(ops->owner);
else if (ret < 0)
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-12 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-11 23:33 [Patch net v3 0/3] net_sched: fix filter chain reference counting Cong Wang
2017-09-11 23:33 ` [Patch net v3 1/3] net_sched: get rid of tcfa_rcu Cong Wang
2017-09-12 9:42 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-12 10:40 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2017-09-12 21:10 ` Cong Wang
2017-09-12 21:36 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-12 21:53 ` Cong Wang
2017-09-13 6:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-11 23:33 ` [Patch net v3 2/3] net_sched: fix reference counting of tc filter chain Cong Wang
2017-09-12 10:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-11 23:33 ` [Patch net v3 3/3] net_sched: carefully handle tcf_block_put() Cong Wang
2017-09-12 10:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-13 3:41 ` [Patch net v3 0/3] net_sched: fix filter chain reference counting David Miller
2017-09-13 6:13 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170912104004.GE2036@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox