From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harald Welte Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/14] gtp: Support for GRO Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:03:21 +0800 Message-ID: <20170919120321.qiw72rsvpwvtj6n2@nataraja> References: <20170919003904.5124-1-tom@quantonium.net> <20170919003904.5124-14-tom@quantonium.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org, rohit@quantonium.net To: Tom Herbert Return-path: Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org ([213.95.27.120]:45341 "EHLO ganesha.gnumonks.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751476AbdISMNN (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:13:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170919003904.5124-14-tom@quantonium.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 05:39:03PM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote: > Populate GRO receive and GRO complete functions for GTP-Uv0 and v1. looks fine to me, though I'm not the GRO expert here. Let's say what the netdev gurus have to say in their review. If you say it is tested with GRO-capable and non-GRO capable device drivers, I'm fine with the patch. -- - Harald Welte http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)