From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [net-next v3] bridge: trigger RTM_NEWLINK when interface is modified by bridge ioctl Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:15:42 -0700 Message-ID: <20170921081542.4c266c83@xeon-e3> References: <20170920162140.369bb198@xeon-e3> <20170921100525.20395-1-vincent@bernat.im> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, David Miller , David Ahern To: Vincent Bernat Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170921100525.20395-1-vincent@bernat.im> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:05:25 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > Currently, there is a difference in netlink events received when an > interface is modified through bridge ioctl() or through netlink. This > patch generates additional events when an interface is added to or > removed from a bridge via ioctl(). > > When adding then removing an interface from a bridge with netlink, we > get: > > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master bridge0 state UNKNOWN group default > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state UNKNOWN > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state UNKNOWN > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state UNKNOWN > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state UNKNOWN > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master bridge0 state UNKNOWN group default > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master bridge0 state UNKNOWN group default > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state UNKNOWN > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 > Deleted 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state UNKNOWN > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > When using ioctl(): > > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master bridge0 state UNKNOWN group default > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state UNKNOWN > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state UNKNOWN > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state UNKNOWN > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master bridge0 state UNKNOWN group default > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master bridge0 state UNKNOWN group default > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state UNKNOWN > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 > Deleted 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 master bridge0 state UNKNOWN > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 > 5: dummy1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default > link/ether 9e:da:60:ee:cf:c8 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > Without this patch, the last netlink notification is not sent. > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Bernat This makes sense, you should probably add a Fixes: tag to help maintainers of long term stable kernels. Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger