netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:13:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170927230042-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506500637-13881-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:23:54PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Hi all:
> 
> We use flow caches based flow steering policy now. This is good for
> connection-oriented communication such as TCP but not for the others
> e.g connectionless unidirectional workload which cares only about
> pps. This calls the ability of supporting changing steering policies
> in tuntap which was done by this series.
> 
> Flow steering policy was abstracted into tun_steering_ops in the first
> patch. Then new ioctls to set or query current policy were introduced,
> and the last patch introduces a very simple policy that select txq
> based on processor id as an example.
> 
> Test was done by using xdp_redirect to redirect traffic generated from
> MoonGen that was running on a remote machine. And I see 37%
> improvement for processor id policy compared to automatic flow
> steering policy.

For sure, if you don't need to figure out the flow hash then you can
save a bunch of cycles.  But I don't think the cpu policy is too
practical outside of a benchmark.

Did you generate packets and just send them to tun? If so, this is not a
typical configuration, is it? With packets coming e.g.  from a real nic
they might already have the hash pre-calculated, and you won't
see the benefit.

> In the future, both simple and sophisticated policy like RSS or other guest
> driven steering policies could be done on top.

IMHO there should be a more practical example before adding all this
indirection. And it would be nice to understand why this queue selection
needs to be tun specific.

> Thanks
> 
> Jason Wang (3):
>   tun: abstract flow steering logic
>   tun: introduce ioctls to set and get steering policies
>   tun: introduce cpu id based steering policy
> 
>  drivers/net/tun.c           | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h |   8 +++
>  2 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-27 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-27  8:23 [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Jason Wang
2017-09-27  8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] tun: abstract flow steering logic Jason Wang
2017-09-27  8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] tun: introduce ioctls to set and get steering policies Jason Wang
2017-09-27  8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] tun: introduce cpu id based steering policy Jason Wang
2017-09-27 22:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-09-27 23:25   ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Willem de Bruijn
2017-09-28  5:02     ` Tom Herbert
2017-09-28  7:53       ` Jason Wang
2017-09-28  7:23     ` Jason Wang
2017-09-28 16:09       ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-09-29  9:41         ` Jason Wang
2017-10-01  3:28         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-09-28  6:50   ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170927230042-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).