* [Patch net-next v2] net_sched: use idr to allocate u32 filter handles
@ 2017-09-25 17:13 Cong Wang
2017-09-25 19:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-28 16:44 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Cong Wang @ 2017-09-25 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Cong Wang, Chris Mi, Jamal Hadi Salim
Instead of calling u32_lookup_ht() in a loop to find
a unused handle, just switch to idr API to allocate
new handles. u32 filters are special as the handle
could contain a hash table id and a key id, so we
need two IDR to allocate each of them.
Cc: Chris Mi <chrism@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
---
net/sched/cls_u32.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_u32.c b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
index 10b8d851fc6b..094d224411a9 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_u32.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
#include <net/act_api.h>
#include <net/pkt_cls.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/idr.h>
struct tc_u_knode {
struct tc_u_knode __rcu *next;
@@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ struct tc_u_hnode {
struct tc_u_common *tp_c;
int refcnt;
unsigned int divisor;
+ struct idr handle_idr;
struct rcu_head rcu;
/* The 'ht' field MUST be the last field in structure to allow for
* more entries allocated at end of structure.
@@ -93,7 +95,7 @@ struct tc_u_common {
struct tc_u_hnode __rcu *hlist;
struct Qdisc *q;
int refcnt;
- u32 hgenerator;
+ struct idr handle_idr;
struct hlist_node hnode;
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
@@ -311,19 +313,19 @@ static void *u32_get(struct tcf_proto *tp, u32 handle)
return u32_lookup_key(ht, handle);
}
-static u32 gen_new_htid(struct tc_u_common *tp_c)
+static u32 gen_new_htid(struct tc_u_common *tp_c, struct tc_u_hnode *ptr)
{
- int i = 0x800;
+ unsigned long idr_index;
+ int err;
- /* hgenerator only used inside rtnl lock it is safe to increment
+ /* This is only used inside rtnl lock it is safe to increment
* without read _copy_ update semantics
*/
- do {
- if (++tp_c->hgenerator == 0x7FF)
- tp_c->hgenerator = 1;
- } while (--i > 0 && u32_lookup_ht(tp_c, (tp_c->hgenerator|0x800)<<20));
-
- return i > 0 ? (tp_c->hgenerator|0x800)<<20 : 0;
+ err = idr_alloc_ext(&tp_c->handle_idr, ptr, &idr_index,
+ 1, 0x7FF, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (err)
+ return 0;
+ return (u32)(idr_index | 0x800) << 20;
}
static struct hlist_head *tc_u_common_hash;
@@ -366,8 +368,9 @@ static int u32_init(struct tcf_proto *tp)
return -ENOBUFS;
root_ht->refcnt++;
- root_ht->handle = tp_c ? gen_new_htid(tp_c) : 0x80000000;
+ root_ht->handle = tp_c ? gen_new_htid(tp_c, root_ht) : 0x80000000;
root_ht->prio = tp->prio;
+ idr_init(&root_ht->handle_idr);
if (tp_c == NULL) {
tp_c = kzalloc(sizeof(*tp_c), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -377,6 +380,7 @@ static int u32_init(struct tcf_proto *tp)
}
tp_c->q = tp->q;
INIT_HLIST_NODE(&tp_c->hnode);
+ idr_init(&tp_c->handle_idr);
h = tc_u_hash(tp);
hlist_add_head(&tp_c->hnode, &tc_u_common_hash[h]);
@@ -565,6 +569,7 @@ static void u32_clear_hnode(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tc_u_hnode *ht)
rtnl_dereference(n->next));
tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &n->res);
u32_remove_hw_knode(tp, n->handle);
+ idr_remove_ext(&ht->handle_idr, n->handle);
call_rcu(&n->rcu, u32_delete_key_freepf_rcu);
}
}
@@ -586,6 +591,8 @@ static int u32_destroy_hnode(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tc_u_hnode *ht)
hn = &phn->next, phn = rtnl_dereference(*hn)) {
if (phn == ht) {
u32_clear_hw_hnode(tp, ht);
+ idr_destroy(&ht->handle_idr);
+ idr_remove_ext(&tp_c->handle_idr, ht->handle);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(*hn, ht->next);
kfree_rcu(ht, rcu);
return 0;
@@ -633,6 +640,7 @@ static void u32_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp)
kfree_rcu(ht, rcu);
}
+ idr_destroy(&tp_c->handle_idr);
kfree(tp_c);
}
@@ -701,27 +709,21 @@ static int u32_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, void *arg, bool *last)
return ret;
}
-#define NR_U32_NODE (1<<12)
-static u32 gen_new_kid(struct tc_u_hnode *ht, u32 handle)
+static u32 gen_new_kid(struct tc_u_hnode *ht, u32 htid)
{
- struct tc_u_knode *n;
- unsigned long i;
- unsigned long *bitmap = kzalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_U32_NODE) * sizeof(unsigned long),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!bitmap)
- return handle | 0xFFF;
-
- for (n = rtnl_dereference(ht->ht[TC_U32_HASH(handle)]);
- n;
- n = rtnl_dereference(n->next))
- set_bit(TC_U32_NODE(n->handle), bitmap);
-
- i = find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, NR_U32_NODE, 0x800);
- if (i >= NR_U32_NODE)
- i = find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, NR_U32_NODE, 1);
+ unsigned long idr_index;
+ u32 start = htid | 0x800;
+ u32 max = htid | 0xFFF;
+ u32 min = htid;
+
+ if (idr_alloc_ext(&ht->handle_idr, NULL, &idr_index,
+ start, max + 1, GFP_KERNEL)) {
+ if (idr_alloc_ext(&ht->handle_idr, NULL, &idr_index,
+ min + 1, max + 1, GFP_KERNEL))
+ return max;
+ }
- kfree(bitmap);
- return handle | (i >= NR_U32_NODE ? 0xFFF : i);
+ return (u32)idr_index;
}
static const struct nla_policy u32_policy[TCA_U32_MAX + 1] = {
@@ -806,6 +808,7 @@ static void u32_replace_knode(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tc_u_common *tp_c,
if (pins->handle == n->handle)
break;
+ idr_replace_ext(&ht->handle_idr, n, n->handle);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(n->next, pins->next);
rcu_assign_pointer(*ins, n);
}
@@ -937,22 +940,33 @@ static int u32_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
return -EINVAL;
if (TC_U32_KEY(handle))
return -EINVAL;
- if (handle == 0) {
- handle = gen_new_htid(tp->data);
- if (handle == 0)
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
ht = kzalloc(sizeof(*ht) + divisor*sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
if (ht == NULL)
return -ENOBUFS;
+ if (handle == 0) {
+ handle = gen_new_htid(tp->data, ht);
+ if (handle == 0) {
+ kfree(ht);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ } else {
+ err = idr_alloc_ext(&tp_c->handle_idr, ht, NULL,
+ handle, handle + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (err) {
+ kfree(ht);
+ return err;
+ }
+ }
ht->tp_c = tp_c;
ht->refcnt = 1;
ht->divisor = divisor;
ht->handle = handle;
ht->prio = tp->prio;
+ idr_init(&ht->handle_idr);
err = u32_replace_hw_hnode(tp, ht, flags);
if (err) {
+ idr_remove_ext(&tp_c->handle_idr, handle);
kfree(ht);
return err;
}
@@ -986,24 +1000,33 @@ static int u32_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
if (TC_U32_HTID(handle) && TC_U32_HTID(handle^htid))
return -EINVAL;
handle = htid | TC_U32_NODE(handle);
+ err = idr_alloc_ext(&ht->handle_idr, NULL, NULL,
+ handle, handle + 1,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
} else
handle = gen_new_kid(ht, htid);
- if (tb[TCA_U32_SEL] == NULL)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (tb[TCA_U32_SEL] == NULL) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto erridr;
+ }
s = nla_data(tb[TCA_U32_SEL]);
n = kzalloc(sizeof(*n) + s->nkeys*sizeof(struct tc_u32_key), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (n == NULL)
- return -ENOBUFS;
+ if (n == NULL) {
+ err = -ENOBUFS;
+ goto erridr;
+ }
#ifdef CONFIG_CLS_U32_PERF
size = sizeof(struct tc_u32_pcnt) + s->nkeys * sizeof(u64);
n->pf = __alloc_percpu(size, __alignof__(struct tc_u32_pcnt));
if (!n->pf) {
- kfree(n);
- return -ENOBUFS;
+ err = -ENOBUFS;
+ goto errfree;
}
#endif
@@ -1066,9 +1089,12 @@ static int u32_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
errout:
tcf_exts_destroy(&n->exts);
#ifdef CONFIG_CLS_U32_PERF
+errfree:
free_percpu(n->pf);
#endif
kfree(n);
+erridr:
+ idr_remove_ext(&ht->handle_idr, handle);
return err;
}
--
2.13.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch net-next v2] net_sched: use idr to allocate u32 filter handles
2017-09-25 17:13 [Patch net-next v2] net_sched: use idr to allocate u32 filter handles Cong Wang
@ 2017-09-25 19:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-25 23:13 ` Cong Wang
2017-09-28 16:44 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Pirko @ 2017-09-25 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cong Wang; +Cc: netdev, Chris Mi, Jamal Hadi Salim
Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 07:13:51PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:
>Instead of calling u32_lookup_ht() in a loop to find
>a unused handle, just switch to idr API to allocate
>new handles. u32 filters are special as the handle
>could contain a hash table id and a key id, so we
>need two IDR to allocate each of them.
>
>Cc: Chris Mi <chrism@mellanox.com>
>Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
>Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
>---
[...]
>@@ -311,19 +313,19 @@ static void *u32_get(struct tcf_proto *tp, u32 handle)
> return u32_lookup_key(ht, handle);
> }
>
>-static u32 gen_new_htid(struct tc_u_common *tp_c)
>+static u32 gen_new_htid(struct tc_u_common *tp_c, struct tc_u_hnode *ptr)
> {
>- int i = 0x800;
>+ unsigned long idr_index;
>+ int err;
>
>- /* hgenerator only used inside rtnl lock it is safe to increment
>+ /* This is only used inside rtnl lock it is safe to increment
> * without read _copy_ update semantics
> */
>- do {
>- if (++tp_c->hgenerator == 0x7FF)
>- tp_c->hgenerator = 1;
>- } while (--i > 0 && u32_lookup_ht(tp_c, (tp_c->hgenerator|0x800)<<20));
>-
>- return i > 0 ? (tp_c->hgenerator|0x800)<<20 : 0;
>+ err = idr_alloc_ext(&tp_c->handle_idr, ptr, &idr_index,
>+ 1, 0x7FF, GFP_KERNEL);
Interesting, any idea why this is not 0x7FFFFFFF as well?
I wonder if we could have 0x7FFFFFFF magic defined somewhere.
Otherwise, "patchset" looks good. Thank you for taking care of this!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch net-next v2] net_sched: use idr to allocate u32 filter handles
2017-09-25 19:00 ` Jiri Pirko
@ 2017-09-25 23:13 ` Cong Wang
2017-09-26 5:36 ` Jiri Pirko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Cong Wang @ 2017-09-25 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Pirko; +Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers, Chris Mi, Jamal Hadi Salim
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
> Interesting, any idea why this is not 0x7FFFFFFF as well?
>
> I wonder if we could have 0x7FFFFFFF magic defined somewhere.
I have no idea, it just exists for a rather long time. Probably too late
to change, or at least requires a separate patch to change it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch net-next v2] net_sched: use idr to allocate u32 filter handles
2017-09-25 23:13 ` Cong Wang
@ 2017-09-26 5:36 ` Jiri Pirko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Pirko @ 2017-09-26 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cong Wang; +Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers, Chris Mi, Jamal Hadi Salim
Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 01:13:46AM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
>> Interesting, any idea why this is not 0x7FFFFFFF as well?
>>
>> I wonder if we could have 0x7FFFFFFF magic defined somewhere.
>
>I have no idea, it just exists for a rather long time. Probably too late
>to change, or at least requires a separate patch to change it.
Sure, not saying that you have to do it in this patch. I just wonder if
we could unify this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch net-next v2] net_sched: use idr to allocate u32 filter handles
2017-09-25 17:13 [Patch net-next v2] net_sched: use idr to allocate u32 filter handles Cong Wang
2017-09-25 19:00 ` Jiri Pirko
@ 2017-09-28 16:44 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2017-09-28 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xiyou.wangcong; +Cc: netdev, chrism, jhs
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:13:51 -0700
> Instead of calling u32_lookup_ht() in a loop to find
> a unused handle, just switch to idr API to allocate
> new handles. u32 filters are special as the handle
> could contain a hash table id and a key id, so we
> need two IDR to allocate each of them.
>
> Cc: Chris Mi <chrism@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Applied.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-28 16:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-25 17:13 [Patch net-next v2] net_sched: use idr to allocate u32 filter handles Cong Wang
2017-09-25 19:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-25 23:13 ` Cong Wang
2017-09-26 5:36 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-09-28 16:44 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).