From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] bpf/verifier: disassembly improvements Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20170928.102453.506974154025585871.davem@davemloft.net> References: <52270348-67f1-4e7a-cd2f-9d611ae94064@solarflare.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, ys114321@gmail.com To: ecree@solarflare.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:49856 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751339AbdI1RYy (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2017 13:24:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <52270348-67f1-4e7a-cd2f-9d611ae94064@solarflare.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Edward Cree Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:32:15 +0100 > Fix the output of print_bpf_insn() for ALU ops that don't look like > compound assignment (i.e. BPF_END and BPF_NEG). > > Sample output for a short test program: > 0: (b4) (u32) r0 = (u32) 0 > 1: (dc) r0 = be32 r0 > 2: (84) r0 = (u32) -r0 > 3: (95) exit > processed 4 insns, stack depth 0 Series applied.