netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	mchan@broadcom.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	peter.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com,
	Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
	brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next V2 PATCH 1/5] bpf: introduce new bpf cpu map type BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 21:58:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170929215848.46ca5257@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170929114154.4b5d5918@cakuba>

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:41:54 -0700
Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl> wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:34:12 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > The 'cpumap' is primary used as a backend map for XDP BPF helper
> > call bpf_redirect_map() and XDP_REDIRECT action, like 'devmap'.
> > 
> > This patch implement the main part of the map.  It is not connected to
> > the XDP redirect system yet, and no SKB allocation are done yet.
> > 
> > The main concern in this patch is to ensure the datapath can run
> > without any locking.  This adds complexity to the setup and tear-down
> > procedure, which assumptions are extra carefully documented in the
> > code comments.
> > 
> > V2: make sure array isn't larger than num possible CPUs
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>  
> 
> Few trivial nitpicks, hope you don't mind :)
> 
> > @@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
> > +/* bpf/cpumap.c
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2017 Jesper Dangaard Brouer, Red Hat Inc.
> > + * Released under terms in GPL version 2.  See COPYING.
> > + */
> > +
> > +/* The 'cpumap' is primary used as a backend map for XDP BPF helper
> > + * call bpf_redirect_map() and XDP_REDIRECT action, like 'devmap'.
> > + *
> > + * Unlike devmap which redirect XDP frames out another NIC device,
> > + * this map type redirect raw XDP frames to another CPU.  The remote
> > + * CPU will do SKB-allocation and call the normal network stack.
> > + *
> > + * This is a scalability and isolation mechanism, that allow
> > + * separating the early driver network XDP layer, from the rest of the
> > + * netstack, and assigning dedicated CPUs for this stage.  This
> > + * basically allows for 10G wirespeed pre-filtering via bpf.
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> > +#include <linux/filter.h>
> > +#include <linux/ptr_ring.h>
> > +
> > +#include <linux/sched.h>
> > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * General idea: XDP packets getting XDP redirected to another CPU,
> > + * will maximum be stored/queued for one driver ->poll() call.  It is
> > + * guaranteed that setting flush bit and flush operation happen on
> > + * same CPU.  Thus, cpu_map_flush operation can deduct via this_cpu_ptr()
> > + * which queue in bpf_cpu_map_entry contains packets.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define CPU_MAP_BULK_SIZE 8  /* 8 == one cacheline on 64-bit archs */
> > +struct xdp_bulk_queue {
> > +	void *q[CPU_MAP_BULK_SIZE];
> > +	unsigned int count;
> > +};  
> 
> Out of curiosity - would it make sense to make sure the entire struct
> fits into a cache line?  The comment seems to indicate that the array is
> sized to fit a cache line, but then there is also the count member...

Nope, it does not make sense to align the struct itself for a cacheline.
The idea is that when I bulk enqueue transfer (from this percpu mem)
into the shared queue (ptr_ring), then I dirty a cacheline, thus I
might as well fill up the cacheline.


> > +/*
> > + * After xchg pointer to bpf_cpu_map_entry, use the call_rcu() to  
> ...
> 
> There is a mix for networking and non-networking style comments in this
> file, is this intentional?

No
 
> > +const struct bpf_map_ops cpu_map_ops = {
> > +	.map_alloc		= cpu_map_alloc,
> > +	.map_free		= cpu_map_free,
> > +	.map_delete_elem	= cpu_map_delete_elem,
> > +	.map_update_elem	= cpu_map_update_elem,
> > +	.map_lookup_elem	= cpu_map_lookup_elem,
> > +	.map_get_next_key	= cpu_map_get_next_key,
> > +};
> > +
> > +  
> 
> Extra new line.

Sorry

> > +/* Runs under RCU-read-side, plus in softirq under NAPI protection.
> > + * Thus, safe percpu variable access.
> > + */
> > +static int bq_enqueue(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu, struct xdp_pkt *xdp_pkt)
> > +{
> > +	struct xdp_bulk_queue *bq = this_cpu_ptr(rcpu->bulkq);
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely(bq->count == CPU_MAP_BULK_SIZE)) {
> > +		bq_flush_to_queue(rcpu, bq);
> > +	}  
> 
> Curly brackets not needed.

Sorry

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-29 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-29 16:34 [net-next V2 PATCH 0/5] New bpf cpumap type for XDP_REDIRECT Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-09-29 16:34 ` [net-next V2 PATCH 1/5] bpf: introduce new bpf cpu map type BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-09-29 18:41   ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-09-29 19:58     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-09-29 16:34 ` [net-next V2 PATCH 2/5] bpf: XDP_REDIRECT enable use of cpumap Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-01  0:13   ` kbuild test robot
2017-09-29 16:34 ` [net-next V2 PATCH 3/5] bpf: cpumap xdp_buff to skb conversion and allocation Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-09-29 16:34 ` [net-next V2 PATCH 4/5] bpf: cpumap add tracepoints Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-09-29 16:34 ` [net-next V2 PATCH 5/5] samples/bpf: add cpumap sample program xdp_redirect_cpu Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-09-30  3:06   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-02 12:07     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-02 19:44       ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170929215848.46ca5257@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kubakici@wp.pl \
    --cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).