From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
oss-drivers@netronome.com,
David Beckett <david.beckett@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] tools: bpftool: add documentation
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 21:29:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171003042906.24mnbsfbs3bkp2wy@ast-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171002183509.76b2cc65@cakuba>
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 06:35:09PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > will pretty print them as verifier output as well?
>
> We tried to use LLVM as a library for this but the interface is
> painfully unstable and it's a heavy dependency. The current thinking
> is to try to put the instruction printing code in some higher level
> library, but I would rather leave that as a follow up.
follow up, of course.
Not depending on llvm is must have for this tool.
I think we need tiny and simple tools first.
Since you're using gpl+bsd license for this tool I think
it would be fine to copy-paste verifier's pretty print code into it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-03 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-02 23:11 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] tools: add bpftool Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-02 23:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] tools: rename tools/net directory to tools/bpf Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-02 23:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] tools: bpf: add bpftool Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-02 23:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] tools: bpftool: add documentation Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-03 0:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-03 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-03 4:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2017-10-03 15:39 ` David Ahern
2017-10-03 16:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-03 16:09 ` David Ahern
2017-10-03 17:57 ` [RFC 1/2] bpf: move instruction printing into a separate file Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-03 17:57 ` [RFC 2/2] tools: bpftool: use the kernel's instruction printer Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-03 19:32 ` [RFC 1/2] bpf: move instruction printing into a separate file Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-03 20:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-04 0:20 ` [RFC] bpf: remove global verifier state Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-04 2:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-04 3:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-10-04 3:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-04 19:13 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-04 21:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-04 22:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-03 14:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] tools: bpftool: add documentation Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-03 20:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] tools: add bpftool Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-04 0:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-04 11:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-04 4:33 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171003042906.24mnbsfbs3bkp2wy@ast-mbp \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=david.beckett@netronome.com \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox