From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] tools: add bpftool Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:48:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20171003174822.214e4337@cakuba> References: <20171002231130.12406-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> <20171003201942.GH25388@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, oss-drivers@netronome.com To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Return-path: Received: from mx4.wp.pl ([212.77.101.11]:10111 "EHLO mx4.wp.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750865AbdJDAsa (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2017 20:48:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20171003201942.GH25388@kernel.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:19:42 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 04:11:27PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski escreveu: > > Hi! > > > > This set adds bpftool to the tools/ directory. The first > > patch renames tools/net to tools/bpf, the second one adds > > the new code, while the third adds simple documentation. > > > > v2: > > - report names, map ids, load time, uid; > > - add docs/man pages; > > - general cleanups & fixes. > > > > Thanks to David Beckett for help with docs and testing. > > Why not call it just 'bpf'? bpftool was suggested as a better name, I don't really mind either way.