From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Kaehlcke Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfp: convert nfp_eth_set_bit_config() into a macro Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:16:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20171004231649.GP173745@google.com> References: <20171003200546.165731-1-mka@chromium.org> <1507140439.4434.14.camel@perches.com> <20171004184957.GO173745@google.com> <20171004152203.2a4f564d@cakuba.netronome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Joe Perches , "David S . Miller" , Simon Horman , Dirk van der Merwe , oss-drivers@netronome.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Renato Golin , Manoj Gupta , Guenter Roeck , Doug Anderson To: Jakub Kicinski Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171004152203.2a4f564d@cakuba.netronome.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Jakub, El Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 03:22:03PM -0700 Jakub Kicinski ha dit: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:49:57 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > > > El Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 11:07:19AM -0700 Joe Perches ha dit: > > > > > On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 13:05 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > > > nfp_eth_set_bit_config() is marked as __always_inline to allow gcc to > > > > identify the 'mask' parameter as known to be constant at compile time, > > > > which is required to use the FIELD_GET() macro. > > > > > > > > The forced inlining does the trick for gcc, but for kernel builds with > > > > clang it results in undefined symbols: > > > > > > Can't you use local different FIELD_PREP/FIELD_GET macros > > > with a different name without the BUILD_BUG tests? > > > > > > i.e.: > > > > > > #define NFP_FIELD_PREP(_mask, _val) \ > > > ({ \ > > > ((typeof(_mask))(_val) << __bf_shf(_mask)) & (_mask); \ > > > }) > > > > > > #define NFP_FIELD_GET(_mask, _reg) \ > > > ({ \ > > > (typeof(_mask))(((_reg) & (_mask)) >> __bf_shf(_mask)); \ > > > }) > > > > > > Then the __always_inline can be removed from > > > nfp_eth_set_bit_config too. > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. This seems a viable alternative if David > > and the NFP owners can live without the extra checking provided by > > __BF_FIELD_CHECK. > > The reason the __BF_FIELD_CHECK refuses to compile non-constant masks > is that it will require runtime ffs on the mask, which is potentially > costly. I would also feel quite stupid adding those macros to the nfp > driver, given that I specifically created the bitfield.h header to not > have to reimplement these in every driver I write/maintain. That make sense, thanks for providing more context. > Can you please test the patch I provided in the other reply? With this patch there are no errors when building the kernel with clang. Thanks! Matthias