From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
pavel.odintsov@gmail.com, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
mchan@broadcom.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
peter.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next V4 PATCH 3/5] bpf: cpumap xdp_buff to skb conversion and allocation
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:11:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171006141140.0f252f73@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59D607F3.6090306@iogearbox.net>
On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 12:22:43 +0200
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 10/04/2017 02:03 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> [...]
> > static int cpu_map_kthread_run(void *data)
> > {
> > struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu = data;
> >
> > set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> > + unsigned int processed = 0, drops = 0;
> > struct xdp_pkt *xdp_pkt;
> >
> > - schedule();
> > - /* Do work */
> > - while ((xdp_pkt = ptr_ring_consume(rcpu->queue))) {
> > - /* For now just "refcnt-free" */
> > - page_frag_free(xdp_pkt);
> > + /* Release CPU reschedule checks */
> > + if (__ptr_ring_empty(rcpu->queue)) {
> > + schedule();
> > + } else {
> > + cond_resched();
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Process packets in rcpu->queue */
> > + local_bh_disable();
> > + /*
> > + * The bpf_cpu_map_entry is single consumer, with this
> > + * kthread CPU pinned. Lockless access to ptr_ring
> > + * consume side valid as no-resize allowed of queue.
> > + */
> > + while ((xdp_pkt = __ptr_ring_consume(rcpu->queue))) {
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + skb = cpu_map_build_skb(rcpu, xdp_pkt);
> > + if (!skb) {
> > + page_frag_free(xdp_pkt);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Inject into network stack */
> > + ret = netif_receive_skb_core(skb);
>
> Don't we need to hold RCU read lock for above netif_receive_skb_core()?
Yes, I guess we do, but I'll place it in netif_receive_skb_core() before
invoking __netif_receive_skb_core(), like netif_receive_skb() does
around __netif_receive_skb().
It looks like the RCU section protects:
rx_handler = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler);
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-06 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 12:03 [net-next V4 PATCH 0/5] New bpf cpumap type for XDP_REDIRECT Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-04 12:03 ` [net-next V4 PATCH 1/5] bpf: introduce new bpf cpu map type BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-04 19:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-05 18:01 ` John Fastabend
2017-10-06 9:03 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-05 9:40 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-06 10:50 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-06 14:52 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-06 15:58 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-25 16:53 ` [bpf] 3ea693a925: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel kernel test robot
2017-10-25 16:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-25 10:02 ` [LKP] " Ye Xiaolong
2017-10-25 12:09 ` Ye Xiaolong
2017-10-25 16:54 ` kernel test robot
2017-10-04 12:03 ` [net-next V4 PATCH 2/5] bpf: XDP_REDIRECT enable use of cpumap Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-05 10:10 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-06 11:17 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-06 12:01 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-06 15:45 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-06 8:30 ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-04 12:03 ` [net-next V4 PATCH 3/5] bpf: cpumap xdp_buff to skb conversion and allocation Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-05 10:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-06 12:11 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-10-04 12:04 ` [net-next V4 PATCH 4/5] bpf: cpumap add tracepoints Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-10-04 12:04 ` [net-next V4 PATCH 5/5] samples/bpf: add cpumap sample program xdp_redirect_cpu Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171006141140.0f252f73@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel.odintsov@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).