From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
willemb@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] tun zerocopy stats
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 20:52:28 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171009.205228.714368596112967819.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171006222516.90654-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 18:25:13 -0400
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>
> Add zerocopy transfer statistics to the vhost_net/tun zerocopy path.
>
> I've been using this to verify recent changes to zerocopy tuning [1].
> Sharing more widely, as it may be useful in similar future work.
>
> Use ethtool stats as interface, as these are defined per device
> driver and can easily be extended.
>
> Make the zerocopy release callback take an extra hop through the tun
> driver to allow the driver to increment its counters.
>
> Care must be taken to avoid adding an alloc/free to this hot path.
> Since the caller already must allocate a ubuf_info, make it allocate
> two at a time and grant one to the tun device.
>
> 1/3: introduce ethtool stats (`ethtool -S $DEV`) for tun devices
> 2/3: add zerocopy tx and tx_err counters
> 3/3: convert vhost_net to pass a pair of ubuf_info to tun
>
> [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/822613/
This looks mostly fine to me, but I don't know enough about how vhost
and tap interact to tell whether this makes sense to upstream.
What are the runtime costs for these new statistics?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-06 22:25 [PATCH RFC 0/3] tun zerocopy stats Willem de Bruijn
2017-10-06 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] tun: ethtool stats Willem de Bruijn
2017-10-06 22:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-10-06 22:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-10-06 23:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-10-06 23:26 ` David Miller
2017-10-06 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] tun: expand ethtool stats with zerocopy Willem de Bruijn
2017-10-06 22:32 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-10-06 22:25 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] vhost_net: support tun zerocopy stats Willem de Bruijn
2017-10-10 3:52 ` David Miller [this message]
2017-10-10 15:29 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] " Willem de Bruijn
2017-10-10 17:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-10-10 17:39 ` David Miller
2017-10-10 19:11 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-10-11 3:15 ` Jason Wang
2017-10-11 21:44 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-10-12 11:21 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171009.205228.714368596112967819.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).