Re: [PATCH v2] net/core: Fix BUG to BUG_ON conditionals.

["Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@verizon.com>]

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 10:15:42AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 11:37:59AM -0400, Tim Hansen wrote:
>> Fix BUG() calls to use BUG_ON(conditional) macros.
>>
>> This was found using make coccicheck M=net/core on linux next
>> tag next-2017092
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Hansen <devtimhansen@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  net/core/skbuff.c | 15 ++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> index d98c2e3ce2bf..34ce4c1a0f3c 100644
>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> @@ -1350,8 +1350,7 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_copy(const struct sk_buff *skb, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>>  	/* Set the tail pointer and length */
>>  	skb_put(n, skb->len);
>>
>> -	if (skb_copy_bits(skb, -headerlen, n->head, headerlen + skb->len))
>> -		BUG();
>> +	BUG_ON(skb_copy_bits(skb, -headerlen, n->head, headerlen + skb->len));
>
>I'm concerned with this change.
>1. Calling non-trivial bit of code inside the macro is a poor coding style (imo)
>2. BUG_ON != BUG. Some archs like mips and ppc have HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON and implementation
>of BUG and BUG_ON look quite different.

For these archs, wouldn't it then be more efficient to use BUG_ON rather than BUG()?

-- 

Thanks,
Sasha