From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/4] net: sched: get rid of cls_flower->egress_dev Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:13:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20171010211357.GJ2033@nanopsycho> References: <20171010073016.3682-1-jiri@resnulli.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Saeed Mahameed , Linux Netdev List , David Miller , Jamal Hadi Salim , Cong Wang , mlxsw To: Or Gerlitz Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:56598 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932616AbdJJVN7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:13:59 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id l68so611972wmd.5 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:13:59 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:24:21PM CEST, gerlitz.or@gmail.com wrote: >Jiri, > >FWIW, as I reported to you earlier, I was playing with tc encap/decap rules >on 4.14-rc+ (net) before >applying any patch of this series, and something is messy w.r.t to decap >rules. I don't see >them removed at all when user space attempts to do so. It might (probably) >mlx5 bug, which >we will have to fix for net and later rebase net-next over net. We have >short WW here so >I will not be able to do RCA this week. Or, as I replied to you earlier, the issue you describe is totally unrelated to this patchset as you see the issue with the current net-next. Not sure why you add this comment here.