From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 0/4] net: sched: get rid of cls_flower->egress_dev Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 20:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20171011.201557.1830627406292467709.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20171011074110.2800-1-jiri@resnulli.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, saeedm@mellanox.com, matanb@mellanox.com, leonro@mellanox.com, mlxsw@mellanox.com, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, gerlitz.or@gmail.com To: jiri@resnulli.us Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:42004 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752029AbdJLDP6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 23:15:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20171011074110.2800-1-jiri@resnulli.us> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jiri Pirko Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:41:06 +0200 > From: Jiri Pirko > > Introduction of cls_flower->egress_dev was a workaround. Turned out > to be a bit ugly hack. So replace it with more generic and reusable > infrastructure. > > This is a dependency of shared block introduction that will be send as > a follow-up patchsets group. Series applied, thanks.