From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/4] net: sched: get rid of cls_flower->egress_dev Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:44:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20171011064446.GA2039@nanopsycho> References: <20171010073016.3682-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20171010211357.GJ2033@nanopsycho> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Saeed Mahameed , Linux Netdev List , David Miller , Jamal Hadi Salim , Cong Wang , mlxsw To: Or Gerlitz Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:33090 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750762AbdJKGot (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 02:44:49 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f193.google.com with SMTP id z96so458315wrb.0 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:46:22PM CEST, gerlitz.or@gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:24:21PM CEST, gerlitz.or@gmail.com wrote: > >> Or, as I replied to you earlier, the issue you describe is totally >> unrelated to this patchset as you see the issue with the current net-next. > >Jiri, the point I wanted to make that if indeed there's a bug in mlx5 >or flower, we will have to fix it for 4.14 and then these bits would >have to be rebased when net-next is re-planted over net, I put "FWIW" >before that, so maybe it doesn't W so much, we'll see. The fix is still unrelated to this patchset.