From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [patch net-next 00/34] net: sched: allow qdiscs to share filter block instances Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:39:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20171013073956.GG1952@nanopsycho.orion> References: <20171012171823.1431-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20171012.102148.580269505585324793.davem@davemloft.net> <20171013062101.GA1952@nanopsycho.orion> <20171012.233153.709649098069912221.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, mlxsw@mellanox.com, andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, michael.chan@broadcom.com, ganeshgr@chelsio.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, saeedm@mellanox.com, matanb@mellanox.com, leonro@mellanox.com, idosch@mellanox.com, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, simon.horman@netronome.com, pieter.jansenvanvuuren@netronome.com, john.hurley@netronome.com, edumazet@google.com, dsahern@gmail.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, willemb@google.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:55608 "EHLO mail-wm0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751570AbdJMHj6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 03:39:58 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id u138so19340800wmu.4 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:39:58 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171012.233153.709649098069912221.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 08:31:53AM CEST, davem@davemloft.net wrote: >From: Jiri Pirko >Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:21:01 +0200 > >> Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 07:21:48PM CEST, davem@davemloft.net wrote: >>> >>>Jiri I'm not looking at a 34 patch set, it's too large. >>> >>>Break this up into groups of a dozen or so patches each, no >>>more. Submit them one at a time and wait for each series >>>to be fully reviewed and integrated before moving onto the >>>next one. >> >> Yeah. As I stated in the beginning of the cover letter, I did not find a >> way to do it. I could split into 2 of 3 patchsets, problem is that I >> would introduce interfaces in first patchset that would be only used in >> patchset 2 or 3. I believe that is not ok. Do you think that I can do it >> like this this time? > >Jiri, please try harder. Hmm. Okay. The reviewer would miss the big picture. But as you wish :)