From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: bpf: Hide bpf trace events when they are not used Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 21:11:06 +0100 (WEST) Message-ID: <20171016.211106.146432024027343504.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20171012184002.0661a867@gandalf.local.home> <20171016.205434.1066116631088582472.davem@davemloft.net> <20171016160125.2a927a83@gandalf.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: rostedt@goodmis.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171016160125.2a927a83@gandalf.local.home> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Steven Rostedt Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:01:25 -0400 > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:54:34 +0100 (WEST) > David Miller wrote: > >> Steven, I lost track of how this patch is being handled. >> >> Do you want me to merge it via my net-next tree? > > If you want. I could take it too if you give me an ack. It's not > dependent on any other changes so it doesn't matter which way it goes. I > know Alexei was thinking about doing the same for xdp but those appear > to be used even without BPF_SYSCALLS. Ok, applied to my net-next tree and if you want to apply it to your's too, here is the ACK: Acked-by: David S. Miller