From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] net: netrom: refactor code in nr_add_node
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:27:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171019172746.GA15332@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171019172123.GA15219@embeddedor.com>
Code refactoring in order to make the code easier to read and maintain.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
net/netrom/nr_route.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
index fc9cadc..1e5165f 100644
--- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c
+++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
@@ -80,6 +80,23 @@ static struct nr_neigh *nr_neigh_get_dev(ax25_address *callsign,
static void nr_remove_neigh(struct nr_neigh *);
+/* re-sort the routes in quality order. */
+static inline void re_sort_routes(struct nr_node *nr_node, int ix_x, int ix_y)
+{
+ struct nr_route nr_route;
+
+ if (nr_node->routes[ix_y].quality > nr_node->routes[ix_x].quality) {
+ if (nr_node->which == ix_x)
+ nr_node->which = ix_y;
+ else if (nr_node->which == ix_y)
+ nr_node->which = ix_x;
+
+ nr_route = nr_node->routes[ix_x];
+ nr_node->routes[ix_x] = nr_node->routes[ix_y];
+ nr_node->routes[ix_y] = nr_route;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Add a new route to a node, and in the process add the node and the
* neighbour if it is new.
@@ -90,7 +107,6 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
{
struct nr_node *nr_node;
struct nr_neigh *nr_neigh;
- struct nr_route nr_route;
int i, found;
struct net_device *odev;
@@ -251,50 +267,11 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
/* Now re-sort the routes in quality order */
switch (nr_node->count) {
case 3:
- if (nr_node->routes[1].quality > nr_node->routes[0].quality) {
- switch (nr_node->which) {
- case 0:
- nr_node->which = 1;
- break;
- case 1:
- nr_node->which = 0;
- break;
- }
- nr_route = nr_node->routes[0];
- nr_node->routes[0] = nr_node->routes[1];
- nr_node->routes[1] = nr_route;
- }
- if (nr_node->routes[2].quality > nr_node->routes[1].quality) {
- switch (nr_node->which) {
- case 1: nr_node->which = 2;
- break;
-
- case 2: nr_node->which = 1;
- break;
-
- default:
- break;
- }
- nr_route = nr_node->routes[1];
- nr_node->routes[1] = nr_node->routes[2];
- nr_node->routes[2] = nr_route;
- }
+ re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0, 1);
+ re_sort_routes(nr_node, 1, 2);
/* fall through */
case 2:
- if (nr_node->routes[1].quality > nr_node->routes[0].quality) {
- switch (nr_node->which) {
- case 0: nr_node->which = 1;
- break;
-
- case 1: nr_node->which = 0;
- break;
-
- default: break;
- }
- nr_route = nr_node->routes[0];
- nr_node->routes[0] = nr_node->routes[1];
- nr_node->routes[1] = nr_route;
- }
+ re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0, 1);
case 1:
break;
}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-19 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-19 17:21 [PATCH 1/2] net: netrom: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-10-19 17:27 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2017-10-20 8:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: netrom: refactor code in nr_add_node walter harms
2017-10-20 16:06 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-10-20 16:54 ` walter harms
2017-10-20 23:09 ` Kevin Dawson
2017-10-23 0:41 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-10-23 1:08 ` [PATCH v2 " Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-10-23 1:18 ` David Miller
2017-10-23 1:39 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-10-27 5:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] refactor code and mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-10-27 5:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] net: netrom: nr_route: refactor code in nr_add_node Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-10-27 5:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net: netrom: nr_route: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-10-27 14:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] refactor code and " David Ranch
2017-10-27 19:48 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-10-28 17:53 ` David Ranch
2017-10-29 1:45 ` David Miller
2017-10-29 4:15 ` David Ranch
2017-11-08 22:02 ` f6bvp
2017-11-01 11:46 ` David Miller
2017-11-01 17:34 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171019172746.GA15332@embeddedor.com \
--to=garsilva@embeddedor.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).