From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] openvswitch: conntrack: mark expected switch fall-through Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 02:02:50 +0100 (WEST) Message-ID: <20171022.020250.1931710938240171769.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20171019175503.GA28691@embeddedor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, pshelar-l0M0P4e3n4LQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: garsilva-L1vi/lXTdts+Va1GwOuvDg@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171019175503.GA28691-L1vi/lXTdts+Va1GwOuvDg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ovs-dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: ovs-dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:55:03 -0500 > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that in this particular case I placed a "fall through" comment on > its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Applied.