From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Subject: [PATCH v2] net: smc_close: mark expected switch fall-through Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 20:35:30 -0500 Message-ID: <20171022013530.GA15859@embeddedor.com> References: <20171021202100.Horde.z-7P99HVhWm0m3hXj5cOjur@gator4166.hostgator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" To: Ursula Braun , "David S. Miller" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171021202100.Horde.z-7P99HVhWm0m3hXj5cOjur@gator4166.hostgator.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- Changes in v2: Move the "fall through" comment on its own line above the rest of the sentence. net/smc/smc_close.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c index f0d16fb..a6c6559 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_close.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c @@ -360,7 +360,8 @@ static void smc_close_passive_work(struct work_struct *work) case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT1: if (rxflags->peer_done_writing) sk->sk_state = SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2; - /* fall through to check for closing */ + /* fall through */ + /* to check for closing */ case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2: case SMC_PEERFINCLOSEWAIT: if (!smc_cdc_rxed_any_close(&smc->conn)) -- 2.7.4