From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: netrom: refactor code in nr_add_node Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 02:18:13 +0100 (WEST) Message-ID: <20171023.021813.1166611788274727571.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20171022194136.Horde.CG1baKiAVuDlzYkA6GaU9Xb@gator4166.hostgator.com> <20171023010840.GA32460@embeddedor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, wharms@bfs.de, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: garsilva@embeddedor.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171023010840.GA32460@embeddedor.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 20:08:40 -0500 > Code refactoring in order to make it easier to read and maintain. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Gustavo, always when reposting a new version of a patch that is part of a series you must _always_ repost the entire patch series. Also, a proper patch series must begine with a "[PATCH 0/2] ..." header posting explaining at a high level what the patch series is doing, how it is doing it, and why it is doing it that way. Thank you.