From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sven =?UTF-8?B?TcO8bGxlcg==?= Subject: Re: Problems with mvneta Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:30:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20171023113024.7138970e@r84n0nz> References: <20171018223425.42ce7a74@gmx.de> <20171018225557.43837338@windsurf.home> <20171020002524.4b4cf122@gmx.de> <20171020090956.2b6cc34b@windsurf.home> <01d0cd47-20ef-bbad-cd93-749cc94d0d2f@cloudguard.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , =?UTF-8?B?R3I=?= =?UTF-8?B?w6lnb3J5?= Clement , Antoine =?UTF-8?B?VMOpbmFydA==?= , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Marcin Wojtas To: Andreas Tobler Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:56907 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751116AbdJWJab (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 05:30:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <01d0cd47-20ef-bbad-cd93-749cc94d0d2f@cloudguard.ch> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I've tested a lot on weekend, but the results are still contradictory and therefore not reliable enough. Kernel 4.13.7 with driver of that version: Reverted all 3 patches: 6ad2, a29b, 2a90: works fine. No issues. Applied only 6ad2: Got the nfs socket shutdown error on the first test, but yesterday it has been worked perfectly for a lot of hours. Applied only a29b: No issues Applied only 2a90: No issues. Applied a29b and 2a90: No issues. The main problem is to create a reproducible crash scenario. Regards Sven Am Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:29:33 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tobler : > Hi all, > > > We did also experience some issues with the mvneta driver. > > I nailed it down to the BQL commit. > (a29b6235560a1ed10c8e1a73bfc616a66b802b90 net: mvneta: add BQL > support) > > Here we did an upgrade from 4.10.13 to 4.13.5. Before it was stable > and a 4.13.5 with the 4.10.13 driver was also ok. > > Our scenario is the following, the board we use acts as router and > forwards some traffic. To distribute the load to both cpu's we have, > we enabled RPS (receive packet steering). Now as soon as we stress > the router with iperf3 the eth links go down. The router sits between > a client and a server where we blow load with iperf3. > > If we disable RPS, the links seems stable. > > Doing the iperf3 tests from/to the router directly, iperf3 client is > started on the router, does not show any instability. > > Maybe these observations help to find out what's going on. > > Thx, > Andreas