From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, Chris Mi <chrism@mellanox.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: [Patch net 03/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in flower filter
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:02:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171023220304.2268-4-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171023220304.2268-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Replace call_rcu() with synchronize_rcu(), except
in fl_destroy() we have to use list_splice_init_rcu().
As a bonus, this also drops the ugly code in commit
d936377414fa ("net, sched: respect rcu grace period on cls destruction").
Reported-by: Chris Mi <chrism@mellanox.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
---
net/sched/cls_flower.c | 46 ++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_flower.c b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
index b480d7c792ba..ad33bd00b4f0 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
@@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ struct fl_flow_mask_range {
struct fl_flow_mask {
struct fl_flow_key key;
struct fl_flow_mask_range range;
- struct rcu_head rcu;
};
struct cls_fl_head {
@@ -71,10 +70,6 @@ struct cls_fl_head {
bool mask_assigned;
struct list_head filters;
struct rhashtable_params ht_params;
- union {
- struct work_struct work;
- struct rcu_head rcu;
- };
struct idr handle_idr;
};
@@ -87,7 +82,6 @@ struct cls_fl_filter {
struct list_head list;
u32 handle;
u32 flags;
- struct rcu_head rcu;
struct net_device *hw_dev;
};
@@ -215,10 +209,8 @@ static int fl_init(struct tcf_proto *tp)
return 0;
}
-static void fl_destroy_filter(struct rcu_head *head)
+static void fl_destroy_filter(struct cls_fl_filter *f)
{
- struct cls_fl_filter *f = container_of(head, struct cls_fl_filter, rcu);
-
tcf_exts_destroy(&f->exts);
kfree(f);
}
@@ -305,38 +297,25 @@ static void __fl_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct cls_fl_filter *f)
if (!tc_skip_hw(f->flags))
fl_hw_destroy_filter(tp, f);
tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &f->res);
- call_rcu(&f->rcu, fl_destroy_filter);
-}
-
-static void fl_destroy_sleepable(struct work_struct *work)
-{
- struct cls_fl_head *head = container_of(work, struct cls_fl_head,
- work);
- if (head->mask_assigned)
- rhashtable_destroy(&head->ht);
- kfree(head);
- module_put(THIS_MODULE);
-}
-
-static void fl_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
-{
- struct cls_fl_head *head = container_of(rcu, struct cls_fl_head, rcu);
-
- INIT_WORK(&head->work, fl_destroy_sleepable);
- schedule_work(&head->work);
}
static void fl_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp)
{
struct cls_fl_head *head = rtnl_dereference(tp->root);
struct cls_fl_filter *f, *next;
+ LIST_HEAD(local);
+
+ list_splice_init_rcu(&head->filters, &local, synchronize_rcu);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(f, next, &head->filters, list)
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(f, next, &local, list) {
__fl_delete(tp, f);
+ fl_destroy_filter(f);
+ }
idr_destroy(&head->handle_idr);
- __module_get(THIS_MODULE);
- call_rcu(&head->rcu, fl_destroy_rcu);
+ if (head->mask_assigned)
+ rhashtable_destroy(&head->ht);
+ kfree(head);
}
static void *fl_get(struct tcf_proto *tp, u32 handle)
@@ -975,7 +954,8 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
idr_replace_ext(&head->handle_idr, fnew, fnew->handle);
list_replace_rcu(&fold->list, &fnew->list);
tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &fold->res);
- call_rcu(&fold->rcu, fl_destroy_filter);
+ synchronize_rcu();
+ fl_destroy_filter(fold);
} else {
list_add_tail_rcu(&fnew->list, &head->filters);
}
@@ -1003,6 +983,8 @@ static int fl_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, void *arg, bool *last)
rhashtable_remove_fast(&head->ht, &f->ht_node,
head->ht_params);
__fl_delete(tp, f);
+ synchronize_rcu();
+ fl_destroy_filter(f);
*last = list_empty(&head->filters);
return 0;
}
--
2.13.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-23 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-23 22:02 [Patch net 00/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks from TC Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:02 ` [Patch net 01/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in basic filter Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:02 ` [Patch net 02/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in bpf filter Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:02 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2017-10-23 22:02 ` [Patch net 04/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in matchall filter Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:02 ` [Patch net 05/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in cgroup filter Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:02 ` [Patch net 06/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in rsvp filter Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:02 ` [Patch net 07/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in flow filter Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:02 ` [Patch net 08/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in tcindex filter Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:02 ` [Patch net 09/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in u32 filter Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:02 ` [Patch net 10/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in fw filter Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:03 ` [Patch net 11/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in route filter Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:03 ` [Patch net 12/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks in sample action Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:03 ` [Patch net 13/15] net_sched: add rtnl assertion to tcf_exts_destroy() Cong Wang
2017-10-23 22:03 ` [Patch net 14/15] selftests: Introduce a new script to generate tc batch file Cong Wang
2017-10-24 4:56 ` Chris Mi
2017-10-23 22:03 ` [Patch net 15/15] selftests: Introduce a new test case to tc testsuite Cong Wang
2017-10-23 23:16 ` [Patch net 00/15] net_sched: remove RCU callbacks from TC Eric Dumazet
2017-10-23 23:23 ` Cong Wang
2017-10-23 23:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-10-25 20:46 ` Cong Wang
2017-10-25 1:43 ` David Miller
2017-10-25 22:37 ` Cong Wang
2017-10-26 0:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-26 4:49 ` Cong Wang
2017-10-26 13:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-26 19:10 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171023220304.2268-4-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=chrism@mellanox.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).