From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>
Cc: vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: lan9303: Do not disable switch fabric port 0 at .probe
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:27:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171024162702.GA12347@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171024151410.28494-1-privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 05:14:10PM +0200, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
> Make the LAN9303 work when lan9303_probe() is called twice.
>
> For some unknown reason the LAN9303 switch fail to forward data when switch
> fabric port 0 TX is disabled during probe. (Write of LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0
> in lan9303_disable_processing_port().)
>
> In that situation the switch fabric seem to receive frames, because the ALR
> is learning addresses. But no frames are transmitted on any of the ports.
>
> In our system lan9303_probe() is called twice, first time
> dsa_register_switch() return -EPROBE_DEFER. As an experiment, modified the
> code to skip writing LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0, port 0 during the first probe.
> Then the switch works as expected.
>
> Resolve the problem by not calling lan9303_disable_processing_port() on
> port 0 during probe. Ports 1 and 2 are still disabled.
>
> Although unsatisfying that the exact failure mechanism is not known,
> the patch should not cause any harm.
I agree about this being unsatisfying, but as you said, it fixed your
issue, and it probably does not cause other issues.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-24 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-24 15:14 [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: lan9303: Do not disable switch fabric port 0 at .probe Egil Hjelmeland
2017-10-24 16:27 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2017-10-26 8:41 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171024162702.GA12347@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=privat@egil-hjelmeland.no \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).