From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: don't unmask port bitmaps Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:43:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20171026084347.GC20299@lunn.ch> References: <87h8upeesg.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20171024092234.GA2911@lunn.ch> <20171026.170618.1949112293231201383.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com To: David Miller Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171026.170618.1949112293231201383.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > > I just think there might be potential for regressions here. But i've > > not yet looked at the details to really know if there actually is. > > I realize there is still some trepidation about these patches, but it > seems like the only real way to find out if it causes regressions is > to apply them and watch carefully. > > So I've applied this and if anything pops up we can easily revert. Hi David Yes, this is good. I will try to test this next week with the platform i had issues with. We are only going to hit problems with D in DSA platforms, and there are not many of them. So even if it is broken, it will not affect many people. Andrew