From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: Jonathan Basseri <misterikkit@google.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <jkbs@redhat.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <lorenzo@google.com>,
<eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] xfrm: Clear sk_dst_cache when applying per-socket policy.
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 12:54:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171026105413.GT3323@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171025165227.6469-1-misterikkit@google.com>
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 09:52:27AM -0700, Jonathan Basseri wrote:
> If a socket has a valid dst cache, then xfrm_lookup_route will get
> skipped. However, the cache is not invalidated when applying policy to a
> socket (i.e. IPV6_XFRM_POLICY). The result is that new policies are
> sometimes ignored on those sockets. (Note: This was broken for IPv4 and
> IPv6 at different times.)
>
> This can be demonstrated like so,
> 1. Create UDP socket.
> 2. connect() the socket.
> 3. Apply an outbound XFRM policy to the socket. (setsockopt)
> 4. send() data on the socket.
>
> Packets will continue to be sent in the clear instead of matching an
> xfrm or returning a no-match error (EAGAIN). This affects calls to
> send() and not sendto().
>
> Invalidating the sk_dst_cache is necessary to correctly apply xfrm
> policies. Since we do this in xfrm_user_policy(), the sk_lock was
> already acquired in either do_ip_setsockopt() or do_ipv6_setsockopt(),
> and we may call __sk_dst_reset().
>
> Performance impact should be negligible, since this code is only called
> when changing xfrm policy, and only affects the socket in question.
>
> Fixes: 00bc0ef5880d ("ipv6: Skip XFRM lookup if dst_entry in socket cache is valid")
> Tested: https://android-review.googlesource.com/517555
> Tested: https://android-review.googlesource.com/418659
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Basseri <misterikkit@google.com>
Applied, thanks for your work Jonathan!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-26 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-15 22:25 [PATCH net] xfrm: Clear sk_dst_cache when applying per-socket policy Jonathan Basseri
2017-08-16 9:03 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2017-08-16 9:03 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2017-08-16 10:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-16 11:19 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2017-10-24 1:18 ` Jonathan Basseri
2017-10-24 7:04 ` Steffen Klassert
2017-10-24 16:58 ` Jonathan Basseri 😶
2017-10-25 4:25 ` Steffen Klassert
2017-10-25 16:52 ` Jonathan Basseri
2017-10-25 16:52 ` [PATCH net v2] " Jonathan Basseri
2017-10-26 10:54 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171026105413.GT3323@secunet.com \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jkbs@redhat.com \
--cc=lorenzo@google.com \
--cc=misterikkit@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).