From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [jkirsher/next-queue PATCH 5/5] dev: Cap
 number of queues even with accel_priv
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 10:07:33 -0700
Message-ID: <20171103100733.000026fc@intel.com>
References: <20171102232857.15146.21583.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
        <20171102233447.15146.63844.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
        jesse.brandeburg@intel.com
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:46883 "EHLO mga04.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1756431AbdKCRHe (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:07:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20171102233447.15146.63844.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:34:58 -0700
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
> 
> With the recent fix to ixgbe we can cap the number of queues always
> regardless of if accel_priv is being used or not since the actual number of
> queues are being reported via real_num_tx_queues.

Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>