From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/9] net: dsa: PTP timestamping for mv88e6xxx Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 04:02:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20171108030226.GH7601@lunn.ch> References: <1506612341-18061-1-git-send-email-brandon.streiff@ni.com> <20170929094323.cwh2ubv4odknlyot@localhost> <20171008153821.w4pm6j43lpdvnpph@localhost> <20171106145546.atfjkqf3xdxu4wyg@localhost> <20171107181344.b4itrmd7atxkwc5x@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Richard Cochran , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Vivien Didelot , Erik Hons To: Brandon Streiff Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > One thing that we're not doing (and probably should be) is > configuring multicast frames to 01:1B:19:00:00:00 to be destined to > the CPU port. So i did a quick test. If the application joins 224.0.1.129 on the slave interface, the switch will pass the packets to the host and to the application. Andrew