From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, andrew@lunn.ch, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: phy: sfp: Do not reject soldered down modules
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:49:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171108034911.16382-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171108034911.16382-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
The SFP module identification code in sfp_sm_mod_probe() will reject SFF
modules soldered down because they have an identified of 0x2, while the code
currently checks for 0x3 only (SFP_PHYS_ID_SFP), update that.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 5 +++--
include/linux/sfp.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index e381811e5f11..942288aa9cdb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -463,8 +463,9 @@ static int sfp_sm_mod_probe(struct sfp *sfp)
vendor, part, rev, sn, date);
/* We only support SFP modules, not the legacy GBIC modules. */
- if (sfp->id.base.phys_id != SFP_PHYS_ID_SFP ||
- sfp->id.base.phys_ext_id != SFP_PHYS_EXT_ID_SFP) {
+ if ((sfp->id.base.phys_id != SFP_PHYS_ID_SFP &&
+ sfp->id.base.phys_id != SFP_PHYS_ID_SFF) ||
+ sfp->id.base.phys_ext_id != SFP_PHYS_EXT_ID_SFP) {
dev_err(sfp->dev, "module is not SFP - phys id 0x%02x 0x%02x\n",
sfp->id.base.phys_id, sfp->id.base.phys_ext_id);
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/linux/sfp.h b/include/linux/sfp.h
index 4a906f560817..ee65831fe2c5 100644
--- a/include/linux/sfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/sfp.h
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ enum {
SFP_SFF8472_COMPLIANCE = 0x5e,
SFP_CC_EXT = 0x5f,
+ SFP_PHYS_ID_SFF = 0x02,
SFP_PHYS_ID_SFP = 0x03,
SFP_PHYS_EXT_ID_SFP = 0x04,
SFP_CONNECTOR_UNSPEC = 0x00,
--
2.14.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-08 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-08 3:49 [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: phy: sfp: Fixes and debugging improvements Florian Fainelli
2017-11-08 3:49 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2017-11-08 11:15 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: phy: sfp: Do not reject soldered down modules Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-10 4:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-11-08 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: phy: sfp: Use correct endian for sfp->id.ext.options Florian Fainelli
2017-11-08 8:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-10 4:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-11-08 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: phy: sfp: Separate enumerations and states Florian Fainelli
2017-11-08 8:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-10 4:40 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-11-08 3:49 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: phy: sfp: Pretty print state machine events Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171108034911.16382-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).