From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harald Welte Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 00/13] gtp: Additional feature support - Part I Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:56:04 +0900 Message-ID: <20171112205604.hzuttmo3pocg6bju@nataraja> References: <20171028000937.2631-1-tom@quantonium.net> <20171028080940.dvtzn2cg2rrk6f6t@nataraja> <20171028164759.5nm7dfpsdqpxewt6@nataraja> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "David S . Miller" , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Andreas Schultz , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Rohit LastName To: Tom Herbert Return-path: Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org ([213.95.27.120]:46010 "EHLO ganesha.gnumonks.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750921AbdKLVAK (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Nov 2017 16:00:10 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171028164759.5nm7dfpsdqpxewt6@nataraja> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Tom, sorry for the delayed response. But I remain committed in pushing the non-controversial part of your GTP patches forward. On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 06:47:59PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > Thanks. As indicated, I'm planning some testing later this weekend on > the non-IPv6 patches, and am happy to add my Acked-by and/or re-submit > those to Dave after that. After some more delays and returning from netdev 2.2, I've finally put together a testing setup and successfully (manually) tested with the following patches: 01/13 vxlan: Move gro_cells_init to ndo_init 02/13 iptunnel: Add common functions to get a tunnel route 04/13 gtp: Call common functions to get tunnel routes and add dst_cache 05/13 iptunnel: Generalize tunnel update pmtu 06/13 gtp: Change to use gro_cells 07/13 gtp: Use goto for exceptions in gtp_udp_encap_recv funcs 08/13 gtp: udp recv clean up 09/13 gtp: Call function to update path mtu 10/13 gtp: Eliminate pktinfo and add port configuration I hereby acknowledge those patches. How should we proceed? Should I a) do nothing, you will add Acked-By and re-submit? b) send an individual Acked-By in a reply to each related patch here on netdev and you will re-submit those patches? c) simply create a rebased set from those patches and re-submit them to the list for net-next myself, with the Acked-by? d) be preposterous and provide a gtp git tree for DaveM to pull from? As discussed before, I will not merge/ack IPv6 will until we have an implementation that is interoperable. I have a TODO list of other bugfixes and improvements for Kernel GTP, but I'm hopeful that IPv6 can still be addressed before the end of 2017. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)