From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 06/10] net: sched: allow ingress and clsact
 qdiscs to share filter blocks
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:05:26 -0800
Message-ID: <20171113000526.43d98243@cakuba>
References: <20171112155604.24061-1-jiri@resnulli.us>
        <20171112155604.24061-7-jiri@resnulli.us>
        <20171112235452.164efa55@cakuba>
        <20171113075658.GE1986@nanopsycho>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, jhs@mojatatu.com,
        xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, mlxsw@mellanox.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
        vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, simon.horman@netronome.com,
        pieter.jansenvanvuuren@netronome.com, john.hurley@netronome.com
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:48728 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751377AbdKMIF3 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:05:29 -0500
Received: by mail-pg0-f65.google.com with SMTP id s11so6667374pgc.5
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:05:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20171113075658.GE1986@nanopsycho>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:56:58 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 08:54:52AM CET, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com wrote:
> >On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 16:56:00 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:  
> >> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_ingress.c b/net/sched/sch_ingress.c
> >> index 5ecc38f..ee89efc 100644
> >> --- a/net/sched/sch_ingress.c
> >> +++ b/net/sched/sch_ingress.c
> >> @@ -60,6 +60,29 @@ static void clsact_chain_head_change(struct tcf_proto *tp_head, void *priv)
> >>  	struct mini_Qdisc_pair *miniqp = priv;
> >>  
> >>  	mini_qdisc_pair_swap(miniqp, tp_head);
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct nla_policy ingress_policy[TCA_CLSACT_MAX + 1] = {
> >> +	[TCA_CLSACT_INGRESS_BLOCK]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static int ingress_parse_opt(struct nlattr *opt, u32 *p_ingress_block_index)  
> >
> >nit: why the p_ prefix on all the pointers?  
> 
> Just to diferenciate:
> u32 *ingress_block_index
> and
> u32 ingress_block_index

But why?  There isn't a single ingress_block_index in this patch.
Looks like Hungarian notation.