From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] net: nb8800: Add support for suspend/resume Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:31:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20171114163159.GX30830@lunn.ch> References: <230165aa-eaf1-6e2b-7ff3-45b3ee4ffc62@sigmadesigns.com> <80649328-8d2a-0a6f-a025-6a6c4de62d7e@sigmadesigns.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Mans Rullgard , Florian Fainelli , Mason , netdev , Thibaud Cornic , David Miller , Linux ARM To: Marc Gonzalez Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:54890 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752360AbdKNQcH (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 11:32:07 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80649328-8d2a-0a6f-a025-6a6c4de62d7e@sigmadesigns.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:22:04PM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > On 14/11/2017 14:02, Måns Rullgård wrote: > > > Missing patch description. Don't bother though. I won't approve of > > this implementation. > > I hope I can convince David that you should not have veto power over > this driver just because it was you who submitted it upstream first. In practice, anybody can request a veto on a patch. If a patch introduces a regression, and somebody reports it, that is pretty much an automatic veto. Please work with Mans to ensure you are not breaking the driver for the hardware he cares about. Andrew