From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] enable creating [k,u]probe with perf_event_open
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 01:02:00 -0800
Message-ID: <20171123090200.GB10669@infradead.org>
References: <20171115172339.1791161-1-songliubraving@fb.com>
 <20171122050045.cjt4legewplt3yet@ast-mbp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, peterz@infradead.org,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171122050045.cjt4legewplt3yet@ast-mbp>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Just curious: why do you want to overload a multiplexer syscall even
more instead of adding explicit syscalls?