From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@netronome.com,
daniel@iogearbox.net, jiri@resnulli.us
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/6] xdp: make stack perform remove and tests
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 17:02:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171126010208.672qmkdgax6anmik@ast-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171124023613.16855-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 06:36:07PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The purpose of this series is to add a software model of BPF offloads
> to make it easier for everyone to test them and make some of the more
> arcane rules and assumptions more clear.
>
> The series starts with 3 patches aiming to make XDP handling in the
> drivers less error prone. Currently driver authors have to remember
> to free XDP programs if XDP is active during unregister. With this
> series the core will disable XDP on its own. It will take place
> after close, drivers are not expected to perform reconfiguration
> when disabling XDP on a downed device.
>
> Next two patches add the software netdev driver. Last but not least
> there is a python test which exercises all the corner cases which
> came to my mind.
>
> Test needs to be run as root. It will print basic information to
> stdout, but can also create a more detailed log of all commands
> when --log option is passed. Log is in Emacs Org-mode format.
>
> ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py --log /tmp/log
>
> Something I'm still battling with, and would appreciate help of
> wiser people is that occasionally during the test something makes
> the refcount of init_net drop to 0 :S I tried to create a simple
> reproducer, but seems like just running the script in the loop is
> the easiest way to go... Could it have something to do with the
> recent TC work? The driver is pretty simple and never touches
> ref counts. The only slightly unusual thing is that the BPF code
> sleeps for a bit on remove in the netdev notifier.
I like the direction.
Patch 3 in particular with auto prog_put is a great idea!
Patch 4 - if you want to do dual gpl+bsd. It's ok and really your call as an author.
Patch 5 - I'm only not excited about debugfs. Can you do the same with tracepoints?
Patch 6 - python 3 is a requirement? or can work with 2.7 ? I don't mind if it's 3+ only.
Just trying to understand the dependencies.
and thanks for adding it to selftests.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-26 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-24 2:36 [RFC net-next 0/6] xdp: make stack perform remove and tests Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 1/6] net: xdp: avoid output parameters when querying XDP prog Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 2/6] net: xdp: report flags program was installed with on query Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 3/6] net: xdp: make the stack take care of the tear down Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 23:24 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-11-25 3:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 4/6] netdevsim: add software driver for testing offloads Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 7:24 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-11-24 7:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 8:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-11-27 19:30 ` David Miller
2017-11-27 19:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-28 14:55 ` Phil Sutter
2017-11-28 16:20 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 5/6] netdevsim: add bpf offload support Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 2:36 ` [RFC net-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: add offload test based on netdevsim Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-24 7:45 ` [RFC net-next 0/6] xdp: make stack perform remove and tests Jiri Pirko
2017-11-24 8:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-25 4:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-26 1:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2017-11-26 1:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-11-26 7:43 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171126010208.672qmkdgax6anmik@ast-mbp \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox